Legal Opinion
Tomasso Bros. v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 9, 1994No. 14642PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a permanent prohibitory injunction is automatically stayed by the filing of an appeal by the enjoined party. This case returns to us after the trial court, on *643remand, determined that a permanent prohibitory injunction should issue in order to protect the plaintiffs use of its property from a nuisance arising from the defendants’ use of their adjoining property.
The plaintiff, Tomasso Brothers, Inc., brought an action against the defendants, October Twenty-Four, Inc. (October Twenty-Four), and A. Aiudi and Sons (Aiudi),1 alleging that the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Renaissance Management Co. v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cheryl Terry Enterprises, Ltd. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.