Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
In Equity. Bill by tbe Toledo, Ann Arbor & North. Michigan Bail-way Company against the Pennsylvania Company and others. On motion for a temporary injunction against defendant P. M. Arthur, chief of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers.
1Opinion of the Court
TAPT, Circuit Judge.
This is a motion by the complainant, the Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Company, for a tern-*731poraxy injunction, to remain in force pending this action, against P. M. Arthur, the chief executive of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and a defendant herein, to restrain him from issuing, promulgating, or continuing in force any rule or order of said brotherhood, which shall require or command any employes of any of defendant railway companies herein to refuse to handle and deliver any cars of freight in course of transportation from one state to another to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Benton v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1829
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeymen Stone Cutters' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.