Legal Opinion
Rustici v. Malloy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 19, 2000No. AC 18509PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendants, Dannel Malloy, John Byrne, James Haselkamp and the city of Stamford, appeal from the trial court’s order granting the plaintiffs’1 motion for a temporary injunction that prohibited the city from continuing to maintain a fire engine team at one of the volunteer fire stations in the Long Ridge *49section of the city.2 On appeal, as a preliminary matter, the defendants claim that the temporary injunction is an appealable final judgment, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-118.3 In the alternative, the defendants assert that their appeal should be allowed pursuant to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Spiniello Construction Co. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McClain v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rocque v. Sound Manufacturing, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Ragin v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- United Public Service Employees Union, Cops Local 062 v. HamdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Avery Dennison Corporation v. Finkle, No. Cv01 0757706 (Feb. 1, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Bruno v. Bbc Corporation, No. Cv00 07 16 34 (Jan. 23, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.