Clinton v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiffs, Judith and Edward Clinton, appeal from the denial of a motion to reconsider the trial court’s denial of their motion for a temporary injunction. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of a final judgment. We agree that the appeal must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment.
The plaintiffs are the insured under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by the defendant. They brought an action against the defendant based on allegations *270that the defendant had refused to settle the plaintiffs’ insurance claims, which they submitted after a fire destroyed their home.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Board of Education v. Shelton Education Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- French v. Amalgamated Local Union 376, UAWSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- City of Stamford v. KovacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rustici v. MalloyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Lantz v. ColemanConnecticut Superior Court · 2008
- Danso v. University of ConnecticutConnecticut Superior Court · 2007
- Morgan v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- 18 Brewer Associates v. Mormino, No. Cvh 01-6792 (May 8, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.