Louise Newberry v. Pacific Racing Association and Tanforan Racing Association Peter W. Tunney, Individually and as Vice President and General Manager
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
The major question for decision in this appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants is whether plaintiff’s state law claims against her employer for breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and intentional infliction of emotional distress are preempted under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on Louise Newberry’s claims brought under California law, ruling that section 301 preempted them. The court also held…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- David W. Jackson v. Southern California Gas Company Claudia Dodson Lois Durfee Mary Moore Jean Bish Betty Shattery Pat ShatteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Eva Hall v. North American Van Lines, Inc. George Correa All City Moving and StorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- William T. McCormick v. At & T Technologies, Inc. Cameron AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Cook v. Lindsay Olive GrowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.