William T. McCormick v. At & T Technologies, Inc. Cameron Allen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
The issue presented here is whether an employee’s state law claims against his employer for intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, conversion, and negligence in the care of a bailment are preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). The employee’s claims arose out of his employer’s disposal of the contents of his work locker upon his discharge. The district court ruled that because resolution of the state law claims would require interpretation of the collective bargaining…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Michael Lee Thomas v. Ltv CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Crystal R. Jackson v. Randy Kimel at & T Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Patricia Burgos v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Commodore v. University Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.