Eva Hall v. North American Van Lines, Inc. George Correa All City Moving and Storage
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge.
We consider whether federal law preempts state law claims for breach of an interstate shipping contract and for common law fraud and conversion. The district court concluded that it had removal jurisdiction over Plaintiff-Appellant Eva Hall’s complaint because her claims were completely preempted by the 1906 Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. The district court denied Hall’s motion to remand and dismissed each of her claims.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
I
The district court dismissed Hall’s complaint…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Zixiang Li v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Williams v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Margie Bedolla v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Weston Family Partnership Lllp v. Twitter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.