Legal Opinion
TrinCo Investment Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 18, 2013No. 2012-5139PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENSON, District Judge.
TrinCo Investment Company and Kathleen G. Rose (collectively “TrinCo”) appeal the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“CFC”) granting the Government’s Motion To Dismiss. The CFC found that TrinCo failed to plead facts sufficient to support a takings claim against the Government following the destruction of 1,782 acres of TrinCo’s merchantable timber as a result of a United States Forest Service fire management effort.
Because we find that TrinCo pled sufficient facts to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face, we reverse and remand.
BACKGR…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dennis J. Quebedeaux, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Persons and Entities v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Irwin v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Brewer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Chapman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.