Legal Opinion

Green v. Mt. Diablo Hospital District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1989No. A039971PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

A petition to compel arbitration is properly denied where there are sufficient grounds alleging illegality of the underlying agreement. The allegations, if proved, would render the entire contract void. The legality of the contract should first be judicially determined before any contractual disputes may be arbitrated. It is within the trial court’s discretion to decide whether the claims of third parties not bound by the arbitration agreement should be brought in one judicial forum. This does not circum vent the policy favoring arbitration, because should the court determine…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Henry v. Alcove Investment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API