Green v. Mt. Diablo Hospital District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
A petition to compel arbitration is properly denied where there are sufficient grounds alleging illegality of the underlying agreement. The allegations, if proved, would render the entire contract void. The legality of the contract should first be judicially determined before any contractual disputes may be arbitrated. It is within the trial court’s discretion to decide whether the claims of third parties not bound by the arbitration agreement should be brought in one judicial forum. This does not circum vent the policy favoring arbitration, because should the court determine…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Abramson v. Juniper Networks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Henry v. Alcove Investment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.