Legal Opinion
New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 1997No. 14888PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
This appeal arises out of a mortgage foreclosure on the defendants’1 land in New Milford. Their basic claim is that the trial court improperly granted the plaintiffs motion to open when it lacked jurisdiction to do so because title had already vested in the plaintiff.
*590The trial court rendered a judgment of strict foreclosure on August 22, 1994, with a law day of September 19, 1994, for the defendants to redeem or to be foreclosed. The defendants failed to redeem on their law day,2 and title vested in the plaintiff on September 23, 1994.
On September 26,1994, the defendants filed a Chapter 11…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Windham Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Boone v. Somers, No. Cv94-0705325 (Apr. 15, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Randolph Fndn. v. Appeal Fr. Prob., No. X05 Cv 98-0167903 S (Apr. 3, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.