Legal Opinion
New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 1999No. AC 14888PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*71 Opinion
DUPONT, J.
This case comes to us on remand from our Supreme Court. New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer, 244 Conn. 251, 708 A.2d 1378 (1998). The defendants Maurice J. Jajer and Maria Jajer (defendants) previously appealed to this court from the trial court’s granting of the plaintiffs motion to open the 1994judgment of strict foreclosure, from the judgment of strict foreclosure dated May 15, 1995, and from the denial of their motion to open the 1995judgment. We reversed the judgment of the trial court on the grounds that, pursuant to General Statutes § 49-15, the trial court lacked…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. BretonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Curtis v. LaSalle National Bank (In Re Curtis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Mack v. LaValleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Morales v. Pentec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In Re BarryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Town of South Windsor v. South Windsor Police Union Local 1480Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.