Legal Opinion

McKay v. General Accident, Fire & Like Assurance Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1931No. 23226. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Upon the original trial of this case in the court below, judgment was rendered in favor of defendant dismissing the cause of action of plaintiff, from which plaintiff appealed. That judgment was reversed, and judgment ordered to be entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant therein as prayed for in the complaint. McKay v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Limited, 158 Wash. 207, 290 Pac. 820.

Thereafter, respondent moved for a rehearing and for leave to apply to the trial court for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence which could not have been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Funk v. HorrocksWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Walgraf v. Wilkeson Coal & Coke Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mathisen v. NortonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Ahrens v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Dibley v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Griffin v. Cascade Theatres Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API