Legal Opinion

Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918No. 13750PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Application filed in tlie supreme court January 23, 1918, for leave to file a petition for the vacation of a judgment upon remittitur, entered, by the superior court of King county, French, J.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The city of Seattle caused a change of grade in certain of its streets and avenues, the change being made necessary by the construction of the Lake Washington canal. To meet the expense of reconstructing the streets to make them conform to the grades established, an assessment was levied upon abutting and adjoining property claimed by the city to *137Tbe benefited by tbe change. Among the property so assessed, were lots 28 and 29, in block 71, of Gilman Park addition to the city of Seattle, then and now the property of one Edwin E. Campbell. Lots in the block named belonging to other owners were…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Ætna Insurance v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State Finance Committee v. O'BRIENWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API