Legal Opinion

State v. Brent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1948No. 30170PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

After an Island county jury had found Harold Theodore Brent guilty of murder in the second degree, a motion for a new trial was interposed on five of the grounds enumerated in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 399 [P.P.C. § 78-3] (prior to its amendment in 1933), in the language of that section. All of these grounds except the first, which is not material here, are likewise grounds for a new trial under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2181 [P.P.C. § 136-1], although the phraseology in several instances is quite different. The order granting a new trial stated- the grounds on which it was entered as follows:

“It is…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. MesarosWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. TokatlianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API