Legal Opinion

Toolen v. Amos

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 6, 1953No. 6 Div. 571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

The estate of Mr. Charles E. Roy, who' died in 1906, consists chiefly of real estate which is income producing property. By the terms of Mr. Roy’s will, his daughter, Mrs. Mabel Roy Amos, appellee here, is. entitled to the net income from said estate. The Bishop of Mobile, a corporation sole, appellant here, has a substantial remainder interest in the estate.

In 1934, Mrs. Amos, as trustee, filed her petition against her cotrustee, Bishop Too'len, for a construction of Mr. Roy’s will, and all the beneficiaries under the will were made parties. On January 29, 1938, Judge J. F.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Tuskaloosma v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Wood v. AmosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Boshell v. BoshellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. WefelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corretti v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Marks v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Brugh v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Brugh v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API