Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brugh v. White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1957No. 2 Div. 344Published

1DissentLawson, Justice

I feel constrained to dissent. The opinion of the court neither distinguishes nor overrules our cases which hold in effect that the provisions of Sections 75-87, Title 58, Code of 1940 (The Principal and Income Act), have no application where the life estate - came into being before the enactment of those provisions. See Toolen y. Amos, 259 Ala. 346, 67 So.2d 8; Dillard v. Gill, 254 Ala. 5, 47 So.2d 203. Also see First National Bank of Mobile v. Wefel, 252 Ala. 212, 40 So.2d 434, and First National Bank of Birmingham v. Jaffe, 239 Ala. 567, 196 So. 103. Some of the cases just cited above are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. JaffeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. WefelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Toolen v. AmosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API