Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Tuskaloosma v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 9, 1941No. 6 Div. 861PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

This is a bill in equity to determine the ownership of a stock dividend declared by the First National Bank of Tuskaloosa on January 15, 1923, and represented by certificate No. 157, and a two per cent, cash dividend of $10 declared by said bank, payable to the stockholders of the bank of record as of December 30, 1939. The two per cent, cash dividend of $10 declared on the stock represented by certificate No. 157 has not been paid by the bank to any one. The bill also prays for a sale for division of certificate No. 157. ‘

The record discloses that Martha Hill, a resident…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Earp's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Hite's Devisees v. Hite'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. George v. WidemireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Allen v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. WefelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API