Legal Opinion

Wood v. Amos

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1938No. 6 Div. 288PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The cause was submitted on motion and merits, and as suggested on the submission, the affidavit made the subject of the motion will be considered, if the same was shown to have been duly introduced in evidence. Although the appeal had been taken on January 1, 1938, and citation of appeal served on defendant on February 18, 1938, it was within the jurisdiction and power of the trial judge to ascertain and direct the register in preparing the true record for this court, under the evidence on motions. The motions are denied. Home Ins. Co. v. Shriner et al., Aetna Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stevens v. . MelcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Haralson v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Amos v. ToolenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thurlow v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Floyd v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Propst v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Johnson v. BryarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Lewis v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API