Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. Wefel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 13, 1949No. 1 Div. 343PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the principle of tree farming is to be given effect in ascertaining income payable to a beneficiary of the income 'from land for life or for years under circumstances which do not justify waste pending the existence of such rights.

The land consisted of 10,559 acres-bought, by the testator with other lands, about 1902 at $1 per acre. He was said to-be a pioneer tree farmer, and sold off all the land which he considered unsuitable for tree farming and all that he considered suitable for ordinary farming. It was cut-over land. Testator died in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Poole v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Knox's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. First Nat. Bank of Tuskaloosma v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frost v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Corretti v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Toolen v. AmosSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API