Legal Opinion
Metropolitan District Commission v. Local 184, Council 4
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 8, 2003No. AC 22641PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendants, Local 184, Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (union), and William Rodriguez, appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the application of the plaintiff, Metropolitan District Commission, to vacate an arbitration award. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly vacated the arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrators’ award violated public policy. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the defendants’ appeal. Rodriguez was an employee of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. LizziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Police Commissioners v. StanleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Town of Enfield v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1029Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Brantley v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Metropolitan District Commission v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 184Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.