Legal Opinion

State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 2000No. SC 16121PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The defendant union, AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387, AFL-CIO, appeals from the judgment of the trial court for the plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, granting its application to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-418,1 and denying the defendant’s cross application to confirm the arbitration award pursuant to General Statutes § 52-417.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly vacated the arbitration award on the basis that the arbitrator’s award violated public policy. We disagree with the defendant, and we affirm the judgment of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. City of Boston v. Boston Police Patrolmen's Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  4. State v. New England Health Care Employees UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Town of South Windsor v. South Windsor Police Union Local 1480Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API