Legal Opinion
Metropolitan District Commission v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 184
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 21, 2005No. AC 25591PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
In this arbitration case, the plaintiff, the Metropolitan District Commission, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to vacate the arbitration award and ordering it to reinstate an employee who had removed a magazine from the home of a customer. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied its application to vacate after finding that the award did not violate an explicit, well-defined and dominant public policy. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the plaintiffs appeal. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. Council 4Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Council 4, Local 2663Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Board of Education v. Local 566, Council 4, AFSCMEConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HH East Parcel, LLC v. Handy & Harman, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Board of Police Commissioners v. StanleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Town of Enfield v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1029Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Metropolitan District Commission v. Afscme, Council 4, Local 184Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005