Legal Opinion

Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 2000No. SC 16078PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

This case raises several significant issues on appeal. First, as a matter of first impression for this court, we must determine the proper standard of review that a trial court should exercise in reviewing an arbitration decision involving the interpretation and applica*418tion of rule 5.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.1 We conclude that in such a case, de novo review, rather than the traditional, more deferential review afforded to arbitration decisions, is proper. Second, we must determine whether a forfeiture upon competition provision in an employment agreement, as…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  4. Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API