Schoonmaker v. Cummings & Lockwood of Connecticut, P.C.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
This case raises several significant issues on appeal. First, as a matter of first impression for this court, we must determine the proper standard of review that a trial court should exercise in reviewing an arbitration decision involving the interpretation and applica*418tion of rule 5.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.1 We conclude that in such a case, de novo review, rather than the traditional, more deferential review afforded to arbitration decisions, is proper. Second, we must determine whether a forfeiture upon competition provision in an employment agreement, as…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Town of Groton v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Medvalusa Health Programs, Inc. v. Memberworks, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.