Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1951No. 89PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

The appeal presents this solitary question: Did the judge err in affirming the order of the clerk refusing to grant administration to the petitioner?

The right to administer on the estate of an intestate is entirely statutory. Generally speaking, the right is given to the surviving spouse, the next of kin, the creditors, and other persons legally competent, in the order named. G.S. 28-6. As here used, the term “next of kin” means those persons who take the surplus of the personal estate of an intestate under the statute of distribution. Henry v. Henry, 31 N.C. 278; Weaver v. Lamb, 140 Iowa…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. National Surety Corporation v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Weaver v. LambSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. In Re Estate of LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. In Re the Custody of GuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Raper v. BerrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API