Legal Opinion
United States v. George L. Bohl, United States of America v. Richard R. Bell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 20, 1994No. 91-5180, 91-5181PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we must consider whether the government violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by depriving the Defendants-Appellants, Richard R. Bell (“Bell”) and George L. Bohl (“Bohl”), of pretrial access to potentially exculpatory evidence in violation of the standards set out in Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 109 S.Ct. 333, 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988). We conclude that the government denied Bell and Bohl a meaningful opportunity to present a defense by intentionally disposing of potentially exculpatory and highly probative evidence in the face of Bell…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Supre v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Shillinger v. HaworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Bullock v. CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- McCarty v. GilchristCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Charley HargusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. LudwigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.