Legal Opinion

Shillinger v. Haworth

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1995No. 94-8062PublishedCited by 268 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

In this case we must determine the appropriate Sixth Amendment standards governing an intrusion by the prosecution into the defendant’s communications with his attorney. The district court held that the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated by the prosecutor’s intrusion into the defendant’s trial preparation sessions and accordingly granted his petition for habeas relief. We agree that under the facts found by the Wyoming courts the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated, but we remand the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine the appropriate…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by268 opinions

  1. Foster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. State v. LenarzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. United States v. Orduno-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API