Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold Sherlock and Ronald Charley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1992No. 87-1299, 87-1300PublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

After a troublesome joint trial, a jury convicted Arnold Sherlock and Ronald Charley of assault with intent to commit rape on an Indian Reservation. This week-long trial involved the contradictory testimony of witnesses, the temporary exclusion of family members from the courtroom, prosecutorial misconduct, and several motions for severance and mistrial.

Sherlock and Charley raise many errors. They contend that excessive preindictment delay denied them due process; the court failed to afford them a public trial; its failure to sever the trials, as well as…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. BockDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. DrummondOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. Bone-ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ernest Sutton Bell v. Mack Jarvis Robert SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API