Legal Opinion

Linko v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Judge.

Michael Linko (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying claimant’s petition for commutation of benefits, as well as claimant’s petition for reimbursement of nursing services he received from his wife during his convalescence from a work-related injury. We affirm.

During claimant’s employment with Roadway Express Inc. (employer) he suffered a work-related injury on August 3, 1986. Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable, claimant was receiving payment of compensation at the rate of $347.00…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haney v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Czap v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Toland v. Murphy Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Morwald v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Huskins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Petrilla v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Christopher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API