Legal Opinion

Petrilla v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1997No. 557 C.D.1996PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Robert J. Petrilla (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the *624referee’s decision denying his petition for review. The issues raised on appeal are: (1) whether under Section 306(f) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act),1 Claimant is entitled to reimbursement for home nursing care provided by his wife; and (2) whether a van equipped with special devices designed to enable Claimant to travel in his wheelchair constitutes “orthopedic appliances” under Section 306(f) of the Act.

Claimant, while employed by People’s Natural…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodhart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Rieger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Lenzner Coach Lines v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Morwald v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Ex Parte City of Guntersville v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Griffiths v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Boleratz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API