Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

William Christopher (Petitioner) appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying his petition for a commutation of Petitioner’s partial disability benefits because Petitioner failed to meet his burden to prove that a commutation would be in his best interest. The sole issue raised by Petitioner is whether the WCJ capriciously disregarded competent evidence of record in denying his commutation petition when he was the only party to present evidence before the WCJ…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Volkswagen of America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Linko v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Huskins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Wentz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. In Re Appeal of NevlingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Fields v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. J. Newsome v. City of Phila. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API