Legal Opinion

Huskins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1984No. Appeal, No. 254 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Raymond T. Hoskins (claimant) appeals here an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which reversed a referee’s decision that the, claimant was entitled to commutation of benefits and ordered continued payments on a weekly basis.

The claimant suffered a work-related injury in 1980 and has been receiving weekly benefits for total disability. He requested a commutation of benefits from the referee, pursuant to Section 412 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §791,1 so that he could build a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Bituco Mfg. & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. MontroseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glinka V.Workmens Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Shaffer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Christopher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Linko v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In re Petition to Transfer Structured Settlement Payment Rights of Curto, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API