Legal Opinion

Lengyel & Lengyel Builders, Inc. v. Hill

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 7, 1983No. (2313)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants have appealed 1 from an order which modified but did not dissolve the plaintiffs ex parte prejudgment real estate attachment in an action for breach of contract. 2 The issues on appeal are whether the trial court erred (1) in failing to dissolve the attachment when the original ex parte application failed to state facts sufficient for the court to determine probable cause for the amount of damages, and (2) in rejecting the defendants’ defenses of implied contingency and impossibility.

The defendants argue that if an application for an ex parte prejudgment real estate attachment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Michael Papa Associates v. JulianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Self-Service Sales Corp. v. HeinzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  4. Mullai v. MullaiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Banks v. VitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Glanz v. TestaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Lauf v. JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Glanz v. TestaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API