Legal Opinion
Lauf v. James
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 14, 1993No. 11677PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant, Raymond James, appeals from the trial court’s granting of a prejudgment attachment of his real property pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278a et seq. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly granted the application of the plaintiff, Leslie Lauf, for a prejudgment remedy because she failed to submit a properly executed affidavit along with her application.1 We reverse the order of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary for the disposition of this appeal. The plaintiff was born in Danbury in 1965. She lived in Connecticut until 1987 when she moved to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CooperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Davila v. Secure Pharmacy PlusDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. IsbanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- Barnett v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv94 0138049 (Nov. 15, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.