Legal Opinion
Michael Papa Associates v. Julian
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 17, 1979PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff, Michael Papa Associates, brought an action against the defendants Leslie Julian, Henry Nadolny, and Gr. Christian Moller, in conjunction with which the plaintiff obtained an ex parte prejudgment remedy of attachment of the defendants’ real estate in the amount of $400,000. At a subsequent hearing before the trial court, the plaintiff’s claim was, by stipulation, reduced to $225,000. The trial court, upon consideration of the only written contract between the parties and the testimony presented by the plaintiff, further reduced the attachment to take into account the terms of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
3Cited by21 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Rioux v. BarrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Pero Building Co. v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.