Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Illinois Bell
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 28, 1993No. 1-91-3540PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano
On July 24, 1989, plaintiff Kimberly A. Sutherland, an attorney, brought a two-count complaint against defendants Illinois Bell (Bell) and AT&T, requesting injunctive relief and damages grounded on charges that they had provided her with inadequate telephone service. After defendants filed a motion to dismiss her complaint pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 110, par. 2 — 615) for failure to state a cause of action, plaintiff sought leave to file an amended complaint against Bell and AT&T, as well as to add a new defendant, the Illinois…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fred Honaker v. Gary Smith, Mayor, Individually and as Mayor of the Village of Lovington and as Fire Chief of the Lovington Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Smith v. Prime Cable of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Rodgers v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Bianchi v. Savino Del Bene International Freight Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Cobb v. Monarch Finance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.