Legal Opinion

Public Finance Corp. v. Davis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1976No. 48414PublishedCited by 309 opinions

DOOLEY and CLARK, JJ., dissenting upon denial of rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

In this case Luella Davis (Davis), the defendant and counterclaimant, seeks to recover from Public Finance Corporation (Public Finance), plaintiff and counterdefendant, under the allegations in her amended counterclaim for mental anguish and emotional distress allegedly caused by the agents of Public Finance in attempting to collect money which Davis owed. The circuit court of St. Clair County held that the amended counterclaim failed to state a cause of action. The appellate court affirmed. (36 Ill. App. 3d 99.) We granted leave to appeal.

From the pleadings it appears that Davis was indebted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  3. Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by309 opinions

  1. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Feltmeier v. FeltmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Anita Christensen and Robert Alty v. County of Boone, Illinois, and Edward KriegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

304 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API