Legal Opinion
Cobb v. Monarch Finance Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 29, 1995No. 95 C 1007PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff Verlina Cobb brings this proposed class action against three finance companies (the “Lender Defendants”), three banks (the “Bank Defendants”), and unknown corporate officers of the finance companies and banks (the “John Doe Defendants”). Cobb alleges that, in the making and handling of loans that she borrowed from the Lender Defendants, the defendants violated various federal lending and banking laws; in addition, Cobb’s complaint adds several state law claims. Presently before this court are: (1) the plaintiffs motion for class…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cope v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Valerie D. Smith v. The Cash Store Management, Inc. The Cash Store, Ltd. Harold L. Ahlberg Trevor L. Ahlberg and John Does 1-10Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Demitropoulos v. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.