Manrow v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relator-appellant must establish that: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law; and (3) it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Corrigan, v. Griffin (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 26, 27; Ohio Bell v. Ferguson (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 74, 76 [15 O.O.3d 117],
Clearly, the first condition of this tripartite test is present. The judge of the juvenile court has issued an order compelling relator to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Heimann v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Mancino v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Herdman v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.