Legal Opinion

Manrow v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1985No. 84-1700PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relator-appellant must establish that: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law; and (3) it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. State, ex rel. Corrigan, v. Griffin (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 26, 27; Ohio Bell v. Ferguson (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 74, 76 [15 O.O.3d 117],

Clearly, the first condition of this tripartite test is present. The judge of the juvenile court has issued an order compelling relator to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heimann v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Corrigan v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State ex rel. Mancino v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Herdman v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API