Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1976No. 75-989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88.
*59The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ '
■Judgment affirmed.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Ceeebrezze, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Manrow v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. American National Red Cross v. PokornyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992