Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1976No. 75-989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88.

*59The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ '

■Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Ceeebrezze, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Gilla v. FellerhoffOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Manrow v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. American National Red Cross v. PokornyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992