State ex rel. Yates v. Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
The central issue is whether the judgment of acquittal, entered by the trial court pursuant to Crim. R. 29(C), is a final verdict within the meaning of R.C. 2945.67. For the reasons which follow, we hold that it is and that, consequently, the state could not appeal therefrom. We further hold that the writ of prohibition should be granted to prevent the court of appeals from exercising jurisdiction.
I
R.C. 2945.67, in pertinent part, provides:
“(A) A prosecuting attorney, village solicitor, city director of law, or the attorney general * * * may appeal by leave of the court to which the appeal is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. KeetonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BistrickyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Stern v. MascioOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Tilford v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Natalina Food Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.