Legal Opinion

Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Ferguson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1980No. 79-935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The writ of prohibition is an extraordinary writ and is issued only in cases of necessity arising from the inadequacy of other remedies. Three conditions must exist to support the issuance of the writ: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law; and (3) it will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists. See, e.g., State, ex rel. Bell, v. Blair (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 95; State, ex rel. Lehmann, v. Cmich (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 11; State, ex rel. Masterson, v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lehmann v. CmichOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Bell v. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lindley v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Robusky v. ChickoOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State, Ex Rel. Robusky v. ChickoOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Henry v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Klien v. ChorpeningOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Corrigan v. GriffinOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Geauga County Budget Commission v. Court of Appeals for Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API