Legal Opinion

Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2003No. 02-55997PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

Emma Mercado appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to remand this insurance bad faith action to state court and the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company. Mercado argues the district court erred in concluding that (1) Silvia Luevano was a sham defendant included in the action to defeat federal jurisdiction; (2) Mercado’s bad faith claim against Allstate is foreclosed by Hamilton v. Maryland Cas. Co., 27 Cal.4th 718, 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 318, 41 P.3d 128 (2002); and (3) Allstate did not commit an unfair business…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  4. Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Gardner v. UICICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. Greene v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
  5. In Re Facebook PPC Advertising LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API