Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Emma Mercado appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to remand this insurance bad faith action to state court and the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company. Mercado argues the district court erred in concluding that (1) Silvia Luevano was a sham defendant included in the action to defeat federal jurisdiction; (2) Mercado’s bad faith claim against Allstate is foreclosed by Hamilton v. Maryland Cas. Co., 27 Cal.4th 718, 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 318, 41 P.3d 128 (2002); and (3) Allstate did not commit an unfair business…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Good v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Diaz v. Allstate Insurance GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Gardner v. UICICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Greene v. WyethDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- In Re Facebook PPC Advertising LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.