Legal Opinion

Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 8, 2011No. Case 1:09-CV-02061-OWW-GSAPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 51.)

OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

Before the court for decision is Plaintiffs’ renewed motion to remand the case to the Stanislaus County Superior Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Plaintiffs previously moved to remand the action to state court, however, that motion was denied on grounds that Mr. Loeb was a “sham” defendant whose presence in the action did not defeat diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a second amended complaint that includes, among other things, genuine factual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. Hernandez v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
  3. Narayan v. Compass Grp. USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Aleksandar Mackovski v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Alishia Denise Ross v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API