Legal Opinion
Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 4, 2016No. Case No. CV 16-03743-BRO (FFMx)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
The Honorable BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge .
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gilbert Rangel’s (“Plaintiff’) Motion to Remand. (Dkt. No. 14 (hereinafter, “Mot.”).) After considering the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the instant Motion, the Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument of counsel. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kelli Smallwood v. Illinois Central Railroad Company Mississippi Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Andrew Von Oeyen v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Armando Garcia v. Delta Air Lines IncDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Beathia v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Blain Lomen v. Thomas P. SchmalzriedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- CROFT v. GTT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.