Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2002No. S087346PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

A liability insurer agrees to defend its insured against a personal injury lawsuit. After the insurer refuses a settlement demand within the policy limits, the claimant and the insured, without the insurer’s participation, agree on a settlement. Under the settlement agreement, a stipulated judgment in excess of the policy limits is entered, the claimant agrees not to execute the judgment against the insured, and the insured assigns to the claimant the insured’s cause of action for breach of the insurer’s duty to accept a reasonable settlement demand. The trial court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Archdale v. American International Specialty Lines InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Essex Ins. Co. v. Five Star Dye House, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API