Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Trapp v. Naiman CA4/2

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 2013No. E054908UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs and respondents Bennie G. Trapp, Sr., and B. Garrett Trapp, Jr. (Plaintiffs), initiated this action based on the foreclosure and subsequent unlawful detainer action against them. Defendants in this action include the financial institutions and their lawyers, Randall D. Naiman and Naiman Law Group, RC. (erroneously sued as “Law Office of Randall D. Naiman”). Only Naiman and Naiman Law Group, P.C., appeal (Defendants). Defendants brought a special motion to strike (antiSLAPP motion) under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 1 (the antiSLAPP…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lennar Homes of California, Inc. v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Daniel v. Spellman CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Darling v. Pentecost CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Eagle Colton 55, LP v. City of ColtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Friedman v. DirecTVDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API