Legal Opinion
Darling v. Pentecost CA4/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 2015No. E059958Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 4/22/15 Darling v. Pentecost CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ROSLYN DARLING, Plaintiff and Appellant, E059958 v. (Super.Ct.No. INC1207986) JOHN PENTECOST, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Pfeiffer Venice Properties v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.