Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Jablonski
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 16, 1976PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiffs purchased real estate (premises) in Webster from the defendants Dr. and Mrs. Jablonski (sellers) with the defendant McCann acting as a broker on behalf of the sellers. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants made fraudulent representations concerning the premises and argue that, in the circumstances, they are not barred by the statute of limitations in bringing suit more than two years after the sale of the premises. The plaintiffs appeal from judgments which dismissed their action following allowance of the defendants’ motions to dismiss under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12 (b), 365…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hendrickson v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Joe Turner v. Charles H. LundquistCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Connelly v. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Lynch v. Signal Finance Co. of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Bowen v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.