Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1884PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant,brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley C. J.

This is an action for personal injury, and the plaintiff recovered in the circuit court. The onty questions that need to be considered are, first, whether there was any evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant to be submitted to the jury; and second, whether the evidence conclusively showed contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

The injury occurred December 28>1881. The plaintiff was a woman sixty years of age, and resided with her husband, who was still, older and rheumatic, at Davison, a country station about nine miles west of Flint. On the day named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. HauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Brassell v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Richmond City Railway Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  2. Cross v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Montgomery Street Railway Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. McGovern v. Inter Urban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Citizens Street Railroad v. HoffbauerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API