Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealth
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
In a separate order filed concurrently with this order, we certified a question on Oregon price discrimination law to the Oregon Supreme Court. Accordingly, the opinion filed on September 4, 2007 is AMENDED as follows.
First, the last paragraph before section “I,” originally, 502 F.3d at 901:
We vacate the jury’s verdict in favor of McKenzie on the attempted monopolization, price discrimination, and tortious interference claims, and we vacate the district court’s summary judgment in favor of PeaceHealth on the tying claim. We also vacate the…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Emeldi v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ventress v. Japan AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- FTC v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.